Swing To Trade
  • Stock
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
Sports

The teams that benefit if the College Football Playoff expands field of 16

by admin June 10, 2025
June 10, 2025
  • If College Football Playoff indeed expands to 16 teams, it will become a more attainable destination for three-loss teams from coast to coast.
  • Bigger playoff could help teams ranging from Alabama and Michigan to Northwestern and Kentucky.
  • In multiple seasons, the SEC would have qualified seven teams for a 16-team playoff.

When Oregon State went 9-3 during the 2022 regular season – its best season in 16 years – the Beavers earned a trip to the Las Vegas Bowl. If a 16-team College Football Playoff had been in place that season, the Beavers would have qualified.

Conference commissioners are debating the playoff’s future format for 2026 and beyond, and momentum swells behind growing the playoff from 12 to 16 teams.

If the playoff indeed expands by four teams, it will become a more attainable destination for three-loss teams from coast to coast.

No two-loss team ever qualified for the playoff until the playoff grew from four to 12 teams. No three-loss team has ever qualified, but my analysis of the 11-year playoff era shows that at least two three-loss teams would have made the playoff each year if a 5+11 playoff format had been in place during those seasons.

That 5+11 model is the favored format by the Big 12 and ACC, and it’s gaining support within the SEC, too. In that model, the top five conference champions would gain automatic bids, and the remaining 11 spots would be filled via at-large selection.

The Big Ten favors a different 16-team model in which most qualifiers would gain entry via an auto-bid process. For the purposes of my analysis, I used the 5+11 framework.

The analysis became tricky, because so many teams changed conferences in the past 11 years. I counted teams in the conferences that they’ll call home in 2026. So, a bid for Texas counted toward the SEC, a bid for Oregon counted for the Big Ten, and so on. In some years when Texas or Oklahoma, now in the SEC, won the Big 12, I awarded an automatic bid to the Big 12’s runner-up. Other years, I assigned the Big 12’s auto bid to Central Florida or Cincinnati – those schools are now in the Big 12 – when those schools were highly ranked and won conference championships. Assigning the Group of Six’s automatic qualifier became a chore in certain years, too, because of conference realignment.

You could conduct this analysis in slightly different ways, but it wouldn’t change the upshot that a 16-team playoff would have been a boon for three-loss teams these past 11 years.

FALL FROM GRACE: SEC explanations shows its no longer top playoff dog

NO CUPCAKES: If SEC wants playoff respect, it needs tougher games

Last season, a trio of three-loss SEC teams – Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina – would have qualified.

The SEC and Big Ten would have benefited most from the four extra at-large spots, as compared to a 12-team playoff, but teams from the Big 12, ACC, the reconstructed Pac-12 and Notre Dame also would have grabbed last-four-in spots in some years.

In 2014, a whopping seven teams with three losses scattered across each of the Power Four conferences would have qualified for a 16-team playoff using the 5+11 format.

Oh, and how about this: The playoff would have featured its first four-loss teams. Auburn (2016), Stanford (2017) and Texas (2018) were four-loss teams ranked high enough to crack a 16-team playoff.

In other words, once the playoff hits 16 teams, it’s no longer a destination reserved for the elite.

Kentucky, Northwestern could have made 16-team playoff

Based off past results during the playoff era, the four extra at-large bids would have helped teams ranging from Northwestern, Kentucky, UCLA, Washington State and Georgia Tech to blue bloods like Alabama and Michigan.

“Sixteen teams, you’d get more people excited about it, more people in play,” said Mississippi coach Lane Kiffin, a proponent of a 16-team playoff.

Beyond the 16 teams that qualify would be many more remaining in playoff contention into November.

The 12-team playoff ‘created a lot of interest,’ Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark said during a call with reporters. ‘Going to 16 teams, I think, there’s more of that.”

The four-team playoff became an exclusive party reserved for top-perch programs like Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma and Clemson.

A 16-team playoff would broaden avenues of access to the middle class and even traditionally lower-tier teams within power conferences that could align the stars and crack the bracket with a 9-3 record.

Blue-blooded Alabama twice would have been among the last-four-in in a 5+11 playoff format. That’s also true of fellow blue bloods like Michigan and Notre Dame. Also, though, Northwestern twice would have qualified in the last-four-in.

Three times in the past 11 years, Ole Miss would have been in the last-four-in of a 5+11 playoff, ranking the Rebels as the biggest beneficiary of the playoff expanding by four teams.

Is it any wonder Kiffin wants 16 teams?

Expanded College Football Playoff would help blue bloods, too

Here are some other findings from my analysis applying the 5+11 format to the past 11 seasons:

∎ Alabama and Ohio State never would have missed the playoff. Georgia would have qualified in nine of 11 seasons, and Clemson would have qualified eight times.

∎ Notre Dame is among the programs that would have qualified seven times.

∎ The Big Ten would have led with 53 bids, followed by the SEC’s 51, meaning each conference would have averaged more than four bids per year. The Big 12 and ACC would have averaged more than two bids per year.

∎ Fourteen of the SEC’s 16 programs would have qualified at least once, with Arkansas and Vanderbilt as the only exceptions.

∎ Twelve of the Big Ten’s 18 programs would have qualified at least once. The non-qualifiers would have been Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, Purdue and Rutgers.

∎ The Big Ten would have peaked at six bids but never qualified fewer than four teams.

∎ The SEC’s bid total would have bottomed out at three bids but peaked with seven bids in 2018 and again in 2023.

∎ Thirty-one programs would have qualified as a last-four-in team at least once throughout the 11 years.

No wonder the 16-team playoff concept gains steam. The four extra spots would help a wide range of programs gain playoff access.

College football accelerates away from an era that demanded an undefeated or one-loss record to make an elitist playoff, and toward a terrain in which 9-3 equals a playoff berth instead of a mid-tier bowl bid.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

previous post
Baseball tournament winners and losers as College World Series field is set
next post
Canelo Alvarez to defend boxing title live on Netflix in September

Related Posts

Will the Supreme Court uphold bans on trans...

January 13, 2026

Ranking the top 8 QBs for NFL free...

January 13, 2026

Purpose of participation bans is to erase transgender...

January 13, 2026

Adelaide United refutes homophobia claims from ex-player

January 13, 2026

NFC South team teases plans to change its...

January 13, 2026

NBA team’s ‘light the beam’ celebration sparks trend

January 12, 2026

Lindsey Heaps comes home: USWNT captain signs with...

January 12, 2026

Watch: Mike Vrabel gets bloody lip from ‘turnt’...

January 12, 2026

WNBA vets Aari McDonald, Rachel Banham launch new...

January 12, 2026

How US Olympic figure skating team was picked...

January 12, 2026
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Recent Posts

    • Google stock is soaring today, but analysts sound cautious: here’s why

      January 13, 2026
    • JPMorgan stock in focus as CFO says bank will fight Trump’s credit card cap

      January 13, 2026
    • Nvidia stock continues to slide: why investors remain cautious

      January 13, 2026
    • 3 reasons why Tesla stock (TSLA) could be a ‘buy’ ahead of Q4 earnings

      January 13, 2026
    • Goldman Sachs explains why SMCI stock price nightmare isn’t over yet

      January 13, 2026
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 SwingToTrade.com All Rights Reserved.

    Swing To Trade
    • Stock
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Sports